What is the meaning of Aslan’s name in Narnia? I have always found it curious that the name of Aslan caused such different reactions in the Pevensie children. In fact, when I first read that passage, something jumped in me too:
âAt the name of Aslan each one of the children felt something jump in its inside. Peter felt suddenly brave and adventurous. Susan felt as if some delicious smell or some delightful strain of music had just floated by her. And Lucy got the feeling you have when you wake up in the morning and realize that it is the beginning of the holidays or the beginning of summer.â
âBut Edmund felt a sensation of mysterious horror.â
It felt like some judgment was going on. Not externally but internally. The name of Aslan was the ultimate revealer of what was in a person. It amplified the contents of your heart. If there was light in it, you could almost touch it. If there was darkness there, you couldnât help but feel horror.
When I read John 3:19, it all came together:
âThis is the judgment, that the light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light.â
What is the meaning of Aslan’s name in Narnia? When the light comes, it reveals what is. Thereâs nothing else to judge. Judgment is internal. It jumps from within us every moment we encounter the Light. We either delight in the light or hide from it. Depending on the state of my consciousness in the moment, the Light will either make me lighter or heavier.
The same curious thing happened in The Lord of the Rings when the company entered LothlĂłrien. The effect of entering the realm of the Lady was such that all the company felt the presence of some inexplicable magic.
For some, it was a delight. For others, torment. Tolkien seems to suggest that the whole land was Galadrielâs mirror â not just the stone mirror itself. As the fellowship walked through the enchanted wood, they saw their secret thoughts and desires revealed as if in a mirror.
Some liked it; others hated it. But they couldnât hide from it. They stepped into a land of the Last Judgement unfolding 24/7. Galadriel wasnât the Judge â she was the revealer of what was in each personâs heart. The Judgement was internal, not external.
For Boromir it was torment. For Aragorn, it was a delight. Boromir said,
âIt is said that few come out who once go in; and of that few none have escaped unscathed.â âSay not unscathed, but if you say unchanged, then maybe you will speak the truth,â said Aragorn.â
In the final analysis, we are all judged by how we respond to our encounter with the Ultimate Beauty. For some, it is an eternal delight. For some, eternal torment. If you come with a pure heart, it is a delight. If you come with an idol, it is a curse.
What is the symbolism of Pygmalion and Galatea? As we walked around a quaint souvenir shop in Wytheville, VA, called Wilderness Road World Trading, I found myself gazing at some of the statues for minutes. Dancers looked like they had frozen into their position a moment before I glanced at them. Faces looked so real that it seemed they could raise their eyes back at you any moment. They made me think of Pygmalion and Galatea.
The story of Pygmalion is really simple but deep. According to Ovidâs Metamorphoses, Pygmalion was a sculptor who fell in love with a statue he had carved. The statue was so perfect that he wanted it to come alive. He prayed to Aphrodite and asked her to make the statue come alive. Aphrodite granted his wish.
Michelangelo said,
âEvery block of stone has a statue inside it and it is the task of the sculptor to discover it.â
Every artist understands Pygmalionâs feelings. When you pour your soul into something you make, you want it to come alive and have a life of its own. You want it to be separate from you. You look at the work of your hands, you love it, and you want it to be free.
Love, by its nature, wants to free its object. Separation is a necessary overflow of love. Love diversifies. And yet, deep down it knows that the more separate you are from the one you love, the more you are one with the one you love. This is a chief paradox of love. You want the object of your love to be free, separate, and yet, it does not lead to division. It leads to unity.
Divisions are always the result of forced, contrived unity. The devil forces unity to divide. God diversifies to unite. The devil erases all differences and causes splits. God creates distinctions and causes unity. Pygmalion wanted Galatea to have a life of her own so he could love her. Itâs the only thing love can do. Love must free its object. Hate must swallow its object â consume it into itself.
Love is by its nature trinitarian. The Three Divine Persons are totally separate from each other and yet, totally one. Every Person of the Trinity wants the Other to be as Other as possible, and yet, the more âotherâ they are, the more one they become. They are totally free from each other and yet, inextricably bound.
If you love something you make, you want it to exist separately from you. Pygmalion freed Galatea from the stone slab so she could love him back. True love feels the trinitarian dance between separation and unity. It is after harmony. It wonât settle for less.
What is “Through the Looking Glass” about? One of my favorite quotes from Aliceâs Adventures in Wonderland runs like this:
âAlice had got so much into the way of expecting nothing but out-of-the-way things to happen, that it seemed quite dull and stupid for life to go on in the common way.â
âIt makes perfect sense,â I thought after reading it. Since that fateful morning when she followed the white rabbit into the hole, she wasnât quite herself. Everything was topsy-turvy, to say the least.
Thatâs probably what the disciples felt around Jesus when he would say things like,
âYou give them something to eat.â
They said to him, âThat would take more than half a yearâs wages! Are we to go and spend that much on bread and give it to them to eat?â
When you have been around Jesus for a while, you are not quite yourself anymore. He always says something that blows your mind into smithereens. How can you give something you donât have?
Apparently, you have much more than you think you do. Apparently, you are other than what you think you are. Itâs just the sort of jaw-dropping reaction that Jesus is after. He is creating a nonsensical situation that helps people make sense out of life. He turns the world upside down for us to see what it looks like.
âWhatever you think the world is withholding from you, you are withholding from the world.â
Whatever you think the world is withholding from you, you already have, but unless you allow it to flow out, you wonât even know that you have it. This reminds me of the âLooking-glass cakeâ that Alice was trying to cut before handing it out. It didnât work â the pieces would join back together.
âYou donât know how to manage Looking-glass cakes,â the Unicorn remarked. âHand it round first, and cut it afterwards.â
It sounded so nonsensical that Alice got up and obediently carried the dish around. The cake divided itself in three pieces as she did so.
We are more than we know. We have more than we think we do. The world is upside down â it must be put on its head for us to see what it really is. By going through the Looking-glass, we, like Alice, will be changing several times until we find ourselves. To make sense, everything must be other than what it seems to be.
âIf I had a world of my own, everything would be nonsense. Nothing would be what it is, because everything would be what it isnât.â Alice
We can only give what we donât have. We can only have what we have given up. We can only know what we donât. We can only win if we surrender. It is so nonsensical that we get up like Alice and obediently carry the dish around. Surprisingly, as we do so, it works!
What is St. Francis of Assisi best known for? In Franco Zeffirelliâs Brother Sun and Sister Moon, all of Francescoâs friends believe that Francesco is out of his mind. One by one, they go to the ruins of San Damiano, where Francesco single-handedly restores an old church, to reason with him and bring him back to his senses. However, after looking into his eyes, they join him â one by one.
Itâs all about someone’s eyes. Subconsciously, we always look for the eyes that radiate divine electricity. Thatâs why we are mesmerized by children at play. We are mesmerized by birds, fish, mountains, rivers, and clouds. They all exude the light that we are drawn to and want to participate in.
All the greatest world movements start from catching that Divine electricity in someoneâs eyes. The person creates a magnetic field that draws us in. They are like a magnet that creates an electric current in all conductors. You feel it stirring in you, and you want to pass it on.
All major movements were born out of that spark. As long as this initial spark is there, the movement exists and is alive. When that spark goes, the movement dies and gets institutionalized. The institution is what remains after the electricity is gone. It is the only way to keep the form where thereâs no substance.
The scene in the Popeâs palace in Brother Sun and Sister Moon is telling. Pope Innocent III played by Alec Guinness sits on his high throne encircled by cardinals. When St. Francis walks in with his disciples, they look like a bunch of bums. They are dirty and dressed in rags. But something shines in their eyes.
As St. Francis talks about his vision, the camera zooms in on Popeâs eyes. With every sentence out of St. Francisâs mouth, his eyes grow bigger and bigger. You can tell that he is drawn in. The cardinals want to drive the vagabonds out, but the Pope rises from his seat and walks down the steps. And then, the most unexpected thing happens â he kneels before St. Francis and kisses his dirty feet.
Thereâs silence in the hall. No one knows whatâs happening. Franco Zeffirelliâs camera zooms in on Alec Guinnessâs eyes. You can tell that the Pope wants to join them. You can see it in his eyes. They sparkle. The cardinals see it too. They start panicking and pull him away from St. Francis. They put the tiara back on his head so he wonât be carried away.
After a moment of âinsanity,â the Pope is reminded of his duties. The sparkle goes out of his eyes. He allows the cardinals to put all his papal regalia back on him. His eyes grow dim. He is the Pope again. The moment of insanity is gone. But you can see the immense sadness behind his eyes. He succumbs to his duties of being the head of the institution while his heart wants to be moved by the Divine electricity.
St. Francis stretches his hands toward him but is pulled further back by the cardinals. The church starts singing âGloria in Excelsis Dei.â As St. Francis and his disciples leave, he turns around and looks back twice. He is searching for the Popeâs eyes. You can tell they are kindred spirits. But the camera never shows the Popeâs eyes. He is back in his role. The role that doesnât allow for electricity.
I heard a dream of Dalai Lama on YouTube the other day where he said he had been dreaming that in THIS CENTURY, the world would become one big happy family.
I thought, âOh⊠Sounds like wishful thinking. Based on how this century began, I really doubt that the continuation will be any different. Humanity is too sick â just like most people it consists of, including me.â
But then he added something interesting. He said we would only need one thing for it to happen â a realization of the oneness of all humanity.
I scratched my head: âHeâs on to something here.â
And then he said that this one realization would be enough to uproot the very cause of all war and conflict.
I found myself thinking: âYes, of course.â
The problem is that I donât see myself in anything except me. Then I thought, âHm⊠often, I donât even see myself in me either.â
Then, I thought, âHow interesting â when I donât see myself in others, I donât see myself in me. And when I see myself in others, I see myself in me.â Serendipitously, a phrase by Jesus popped up in my mind that I had read recently,
âMost certainly I tell you, because you didnât do it to one of the least of these, you didnât do it to me.â
When I look at the other person, what do I see? How I treat them is secondary; how I see them is primary. Do I see God in them? If so, God is in me. If not, God is not in me.
In other words, if I didnât recognize Jesus in another person, I donât know him, and he doesnât know me. I miss out on Heaven, and I am in hell. Conversely, if I do recognize Jesus in the other person, I know him, and he knows me. I am in Heaven.
Recognizing God in the other is the ultimate litmus test for whether God is in me. The hell we are seeing around us is a sure sign that God is not in us. If he is not in the other one, he is not in me.
When thereâs no sense of connection between me and the other person, I have lost God⊠and myself. But how do I recognize myself in the other? It happens when I start looking beyond appearances. If I start with an assumption that thereâs more to a person than meets the eye, I will start getting glimpses of the Divine in them.
C.S. Lewis said in The Weight of Glory,
âThere are no ordinary people. You have never talked to a mere mortal. Nations, cultures, arts, civilizations â these are mortal, and their life is to ours as the life of a gnat. But it is immortals whom we joke with, work with, marry, snub and exploit â immortal horrors or everlasting splendors.â
There is divinity behind every appearance. Sometimes, it is distorted, but itâs there. If I see it, I have redeemed the appearance. I have glimpsed through. I have seen the divine spark.
Meister Eckhart says thereâs only one way to attain this divine soul spark in yourself and in the other:
âTherefore, I say, if a man turns away from self and from created things, then â to the extent that you do this â you will attain oneness and blessedness in your soul’s spark, which time and place never touched.â
Thereâs no ethics before seeing this divine spark. All ethics flow out of it â ethics spring from esthetics. The moment we let go of self and all created things, we sink into the stillness and darkness that is brighter than light.
According to Meister Eckhart, we attain the divine spark not through any effort or âadditionâ on our part but rather through the process of gradual subtraction.
âEverything is meant to be lost so that the soul may stand in unhampered nothingness.â
To attain true knowledge and commune with the One, we need to recover our inner silenceâââthe language of the primordial Void in which the worlds were made. Then, in this unhampered nothingness, we will start hearing the Music of the One incarnated in the many.
The fragmented world will disappear, and all things will become one, just as it says, âGod will be all in all.â
âAll that a man has here externally in multiplicity is intrinsically One. Here all blades of grass, wood, and stone, all things are One. This is the deepest depth.â Meister Eckhart
Until I let go of self, I canât see the divine spark in the other. Holding on to self blocks my spiritual vision. But if I let it go, I exclaim like Bilbo Baggins after he had dropped the One Ring,
âI have thought of a nice ending for it [my book]: and he lived happily ever after to the end of his days.â
I have done a somewhat sloppy job explaining myself in the previous article on the fall of Numenor and “the encircling of Arda.â Â As many of you have pointed out, I have not demonstrated why the ring-shaped Arda (after it was made round) spiritually corresponds to grasping for immortality by the Numenoreans.
As I pondered about it, a new mythological connection emerged in my mind, which, I believe, will make the connection more succinct. In the famous movie Groundhog Day, Phil, the protagonist, finds himself stuck in one day, February 2, repeatedly.
Hereâs an interesting summary of the movie I found on IMDb:
A weather man is reluctantly sent to cover a story about a weather forecasting “rat” (as he calls it). This is his fourth year on the story, and he makes no effort to hide his frustration. On awaking the ‘following’ day, he discovers that it’s Groundhog Day again, and again, and again. First he uses this to his advantage, then comes the realisation that he is doomed to spend the rest of eternity in the same place, seeing the same people do the same thing every day.âRob Hartill
What caught my attention here is the reference to a âratâ and the âdoom.â For a good part of the movie, Philâs quest is to take advantage of his âimmortality,â but he soon realizes that he is feeling like âbutter spread over too much bread.â (Bilbo Bagginâs feelings after possessing the Ring for a long time).
Phil finds himself stuck in the rat race of life, repeating never-ending circles. As this circling continues, he slowly realizes that his newly acquired âimmortalityâ does not deliver. So, heâs grasping for more and more âadvantages,â believing that he might finally achieve happiness in the rat race heâs caught in.
But the more he grasps, the less it works. By the end of the movie, he realizes that he must let go of Self to survive his âdoom.â He lets go â relinquishes control and drops the Ring of Power, so to say. He starts living for others because nothing else satisfies him. Heâs not striving to break out of his prison anymore. And he doesnât feel doomed anymore.
To his surprise, one day the endless circling ends. The vicious cycle is broken. Using Tolkienâs words, by accepting the doom (or gift) of Men, he has freed himself from the circles of the world. And this is exactly what the great mariners of men discovered after the fall of Numenor and the encircling of Arda.
What caused the downfall of Numenor?
Numenor craved immortality to such a degree that they tried to take it by force. This resulted in a curse â the drowning of Numenor and the encircling of Arda. Spiritually, this curse corresponds to the craving of their hearts. The wanted immortality at all costs but found themselves stuck in an endless circle of death. Â
âThus it was that great mariners among them would still search the empty seas, hoping to come upon the Isle of Meneltarma (Valinor), and there to see a vision of things that were. But they found it not. And those that sailed far came only to the new lands, and found them like to the old lands, and subject to death. And those that sailed furthest set but a girdle about the Earth and returned weary at last to the place of their beginning; and they said: âAll roads are now bent.â Thus in after days, what by the voyages of ships, what by lore and star-craft, the kings of Men knew that the world was indeed made round.â
This roundness mirrors the shape of the Ring of Power. When you seek immortality through some external means (the Ring as the ultimate technology), you are trapped in an endless circle. You perpetuate what you want to escape â weariness and death. You feel weary â like butter spread over too much bread. You are in a Groundhog Day.
Speaking of the laws of fairyland in Orthodoxy, G.K. Chesterton explains that in all fairy tales âthe vision always hangs upon a veto. All the dizzy and colossal things conceded depend upon one small thing withheld. All the wild and whirling things that are let loose depend upon one thing that is forbidden.â
In all fairy tales known to mankind, an incomprehensible happiness rests upon an incomprehensible condition. A box is opened, and all evils fly out. A word is forgotten, and cities perish. A lamp is lit, and love flies away. A flower is plucked, and human lives are forfeited. An apple is eaten, and the hope of God is gone.
But why? Why should something be withheld?
Chesterton writes,
If Cinderella says, “How is it that I must leave the ball at twelve?” her godmother might answer, “How is it that you are going there till twelve?”
It is magic. In fairy tales, the condition is just as incomprehensible as the fairyland itself. The fairy godmother is working magic before your very eyes, which is just as incomprehensible as the condition she lays down. Just like Mary Poppins, she doesnât explain anything. She is magical enough to silence all our questions.
And yet we want to look. We want to know. What we feel is Pandoraâs itch as she gazed upon that strange gift of Zeus â the âmagicalâ box she was forbidden to open. Pandora received her name from Hermes himself â her name means âall-gifted.â She received from the gods every possible gift, but Zeus gave her the strangest gift of all.
He gave her curiosity and a box that she wasnât allowed to open. What an irony!
When I read this myth to my son, his eyes grew large,
âWhat?â he cringed. âIsnât it cruel?â
âHm⊠I guess it may seem so at first,â I answered after a pause. âBut think about it. To trust means to accept not knowing. If you must know, you cannot trust. And if you canât trust, you cannot be happy.â
âAhâŠâ he nodded and went about his business, leaving me alone as I sat there pondering Pandoraâs dilemma.
You have been granted every gift in the world, and yet you are told to accept one small condition. You must not look into the box.
Why?
No explanation is given. The only feasible âexplanationâ is to trust that itâs better. But Pandoraâs desire for knowledge gets the better of her. âWhat if thereâs something there that will make me happier?â she muses.
The moment she opened the box, all the miseries and evils imaginable were unleashed into the world including sickness and death. She tries to push them back inside but canât. Itâs irreversible.
Exhausted, she looks inside the empty box and sees a simple ray of light â a comforting gift from Zeus. When she looks away from her troubles and onto the ray of light, she feels hope and relief.
Pandoraâs dilemma is a human dilemma. By trying to get knowledge at all costs, we let loose unthinkable evils into the world. Not everything should be done that can be done. Sometimes itâs best not to look under the lid. Some things, if let out, canât be undone.
Knowledge is good. Our craving for knowledge is bad. When we canât trust and accept a âno,â we are ignorant because we cannot attain true knowledge, which is a relationship.
When Adam and Eve were told not to eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, it wasnât because God was holding out on them. He was inviting them to a deeper knowledge â the knowledge that comes from ânot knowing.â The knowledge of unknowing is always based on trust!
To unknow means you accept the idea that you are not god. We cannot know everything. We cannot predict everything. When we leave the role of God to God, we become divine.
Thereâs no true knowledge without accepting one little âno.â Knowledge only works when thereâs room for trust â not knowing. There must be this happy tension between knowing and not knowing for knowledge to work.
What is the main point of The Question Concerning Technology?
Martin Heideggerâs essay âThe Question Concerning Technologyâ might be a case in point. According to Heidegger, we donât seem to notice when we cross the line between using technology for our purposes and when technology starts using us. To make his point, he described what happened to water mills along the Rhine River.
Before the 20th century, there were many individual water mills along the Rhine. They were all âbuilt intoâ the river. In the 20th century, a huge power plant was built at that spot, interlocking the river entirely. The river is now built into the power plant, not the other way around!
This is a fine illustration of what is happening with technology in our time â a slow and gradual change from âusing a toolâ to âbeing used by the tool.â Just as the Rhine is now built into technology and serves it, we are building our lives around the âinstrument-defined reality.â
A tool must be a tool. It should help us get things done, but it cannot take up the entire space of our lives. When technology becomes the overarching reality, we build everything into it.
When technology has become the overarching principle of life, itâs no longer a tool but an artificial reality. The rhetoric âbut it helps us get things done faster and more efficientlyâ no longer applies. This rhetoric works only in the case of a tool that we use for a while and then put down to do something else. With modern technology, we rarely do âsomething else.â
In J.R.R. Tolkien, the One Ring is the ultimate technology. It promises us the world but always takes away what it promises to give.
What is the name of Annatar?
The One Ring was wrought by Sauron himself who was called Annatar, âthe gift giver.â It is said that since Sauron was behind the âtechnologyâ used in creating the magical rings, he had full control over them. The one who creates technology holds the power.
The Elves were deceived by him â they thought the technology Sauron offered was âneutral,â and they could use it for a good purpose. Eventually, they realized that Sauron knew their minds every time they put them on.
He was the Master of all the rings â even those he didnât forge â because his technology was used in making them. Some elves took off the rings realizing that otherwise they would be forfeiting their freedom.
Thereâs only one way not to be controlled by the ring â take it off. Using Martin Heideggerâs analogy, a tool must remain a tool. When it takes up the whole space of our lives, itâs no longer a tool. It has a different name. Itâs an idol.
The meaning of this movie is just as hidden as the life of Walter Mitty. When Sean, the photographer, takes his eyes off his heavy-duty camera somewhere in the Himalayas and stares at the snow leopard in the distance, Walter asks him quietly,
âWhen are you going to take it?â
Sean, still awe-struck, answers,
âSometimes I donât. If I like a moment, for me, personally, I donât like to have the distraction of the camera. I just want to stay in it.â
The famous photographer, whose passion drives him to chase after the most stunning natural phenomena around the world, does not take the opportunity to take a picture of one of the most furtive animals in the world â the âghost cat.â
Something is more important for him. Everything else is a distraction. Art itself is a distraction. He doesnât want to miss it. He knows how such moments feel. Thereâs a definite âsuchnessâ to such moments.
Sean knows heâs in it for the suchness â everything else seems secondary. Itâs in this undefinable suchness that has given his art meaning. But what is this âsuchnessâ? It defies definitions. Itâs a bridge between this time-space reality and the Spirit.
When you get a glimpse of this other realm, you forget the earth. As Silouan the Athonite (Russian: ХОлŃĐ°Đœ ĐŃĐŸĐœŃĐșĐžĐč) said,
âBecause of the sweetness of Godâs love, we forget the earth and singâŠâ
The past is gone, the future is not real. Nothing else matters. So, Sean gets up with a smile and joins the rest of the group playing soccer near the camp at a distance. But before leaving he turns to Walter and calls him the âghost-cat.â
In Seanâs experience, Walter is someone who had always given him the same experience of âsuchnessâ before. By looking at his work in Life Magazine, Sean felt the same communion between heaven and earth. Walter didnât know that. He lived in his own dreamworld where he wanted to become someone.
He was someone. For Sean, he was more than someone. Walter didnât know his true name yet â the ghost-cat. Until you know your true name, you donât know who you are. You live in a dreamworld. You dream of becoming. Yet, your true secret name lives in you, ready to be revealed at an opportune time.
This is the name written by God on a white stone, and no one knows it except the one who receives it.
I will give him a white stone, and on the stone a new name written which no one knows except him who receives it. Revelation 2:17.
When Frodo first set out of the Shire, he didnât know who he was. All he knew was that he was a hobbit, and hobbits donât meddle in the affairs of the Big Folk and Wizards.
Well, he did meddle in them. He was chosen to be the one who would destroy the Ring. No one else in the entire Middle-Earth could do it.
âElrond raised his eyes and looked at him, and Frodo felt his heart pierced by the sudden keenness of the glance. ‘If I understand aright all that I have heard,’ he said, ‘I think that this task is appointed for you, Frodo; and that if you do not find a way, no one will.â
Frodoâs journey was the gradual unfolding of his secret name â as the only one in the entire Middle-Earth who could carry the Ring all the way to Mordor. No one else was up to the task.
He was the only one, and he did it by sacrificing his own flesh. His new name, Frodo of the Nine Fingers, was put in a song by a minstrel of Gondor,
A minstrel of Gondor stood forth⊠and behold! he said: âLo! lords and knights and men of valour⊠now listen to my lay. For I will sing to you of Frodo of the Nine Fingers and the Ring of Doom.â
Receiving your true name is the ultimate initiation into the mystery of âChrist in you, the hope of glory.â It is a transcendental wake-up call when you realize that the Divine, who was somewhere out there, has moved inside.
Once upon a time, there lived a boy by the name of Tony who was always bored.
âMom, I am bored. Can you tell me what to do?â he would often ask his mom.
âWhy donât you read or draw?â his mom suggested.
âOh no, I donât want to do that,â Tony would reply through a yawn.
âMaybe you want to help me sweep the driveway?â
âNope, no fun either.â
âDo you want to go out and play?â
âNope, none of my friends are out.â
Whatever his mother suggested, Tony wasnât interested.
âWhat do you want to do then?â asked his mother one day.
âCan I look into the mirror?â he asked hesitantly.
âNo,â said his mother firmly. âYou should never ever look into that mirror.â
âWhy not? You allow me to look into it sometimes â to brush my hair.â
But his mom remained unyielding.
âWhat is it about that mirror?â Tony wondered silently.
So, one day, when his mom was busy in the kitchen, cooking tons of food for his birthday party, he decided to peep in. The mirror stood in the corner of his parentsâ bedroom, covered with a white cloth. Tony sneaked into the bedroom, pulled off one corner of the cloth, and started looking.
For a while, he saw nothing except his own face, but then it seemed to him that his features grew sturdier, more fearless, more manly.
âWow,â he thought. “Do I really look so brave? I am a hero!â
He pulled off the rest of the cloth and peered in. The room behind him slowly transformed into a large hall with hunting trophies hanging on the walls. And then he saw himself as a brave huntsman dressed in a shining leather suit with a long bow over his shoulder.
âIs it me? I AM a hero!â
Tony squealed in delight and covered his mouth with his hand not to let his mom know he was there. But then he heard someoneâs approaching steps. Picking up the cloth from the floor, he quickly threw it back on the mirror and rushed out of the room.
âDonât forget to pick up your toys before your guests come,â his dad said as he entered the room. âHave you forgotten itâs your birthday?â
But the boy didnât seem to hear. In fact, he had almost forgotten that it was his birthday and that his friends would come over.
All he could think of was: âIf only I could take another look into that mirror. It would be the best birthday gift ever!â
âWhatâs going on with you?â asked his dad, looking at him intently.
âNothing,â blurted Tony in a somewhat dreamy voice.
âTony,â said his dad and looked him straight in the eye. âHave you been looking into the mirror?â
âNo,â said Tony quickly and turned away.
Dad shook his head and kept looking at him intently. Tony bent down and started picking his toys.
The next moment, Mom called Dad from the kitchen and asked him to go and buy a dozen eggs while she was elbow-deep in dough. So, as soon as his dad was out, Tony sneaked into the bedroom and pulled off the cloth.
How did Dostoevsky come to believe that beauty will save the world? He served his four-year sentence in a labor camp in Omsk where I was born. The barracks where the prisoners were kept are still there to this day and now form the âhistorical part of the cityâ with Dostoyevskyâs monument at the entrance.
Four years of hard labor in Siberia in the middle of the 19th century were tantalizing. And yet, in this furnace, Dostoyevskyâs main philosophical ideas were forged, which he later fleshed out in Crime and Punishment and The Brothers Karamazov.
Scholars agree that during this time, a radical shift happened in his thinking from looking for external solutions to the worldâs problems to discovering beauty as the only solution to evil.
The pinnacle of his âbeauty-will-save-the-worldâ narrative is his poem The Great Inquisitor in The Brothers Karamazov.
The 90-year-old cardinal arrests Jesus and makes a strong case for why the system of the world based on worshiping external authority is the only solution for those weak and unruly human beings to live happily. He scoffs at Jesus for believing in humans too much. They donât want freedom. They want bread and someone to bow down to.
We â the system of the world â provided them with all that. Donât you dare ruin it! Itâs the only way to keep evil in check. Jesus doesnât respond. He is silent. After the old man finishes his tirade, Jesus stands up and kisses him gently. The old man doesnât execute him as he promised. He lets him go. Why?
Because he met with the ultimate beauty. Jesusâs kiss awakened him to a sudden realization that haunted his dreams for many years. Suddenly, he knew in his heart that all his arguments were a bunch of baloney.
Thereâs beauty in the world that makes a man forget all about bread and security. It is the beauty of seeing someone readily becoming a willing sacrifice for you. The Grand Inquisitor understands that Jesus is ready to die again as many times as necessary so people can be free. So, he lets him go, unable to resist the inner call of Beauty.
Dostoyevskyâs famous phrase âBeauty will save the worldâ sums up his whole philosophy and strangely resonates with the insights of other great thinkers of the 19th and 20th centuries. One of them was Victor Hugo, who, according to Dostoyevsky, was his source of inspiration.